Atlantic wolffish

Anarhichas lupus


Technical report
Published by

Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, Iceland

Published

7 June 2024

Fishery

The main fishing grounds for Atlantic wolffish are in the west and northwest part of the Icelandic shelf. From 2010, the proportion of the catch has been increasing in northwest of Iceland compared to west of Iceland. Catches at the main spawning ground (Látragrunn) west of Iceland have been decreasing since 2008 (Figure 1 and Figure 2). About 80% of the catch of Atlantic wolffish is caught at depths less than 120 m. Proportion of the catch taken at depth range 0-60 m decreased from 2003 to 2007, but since then it has been increasing. At the depth range 61-120 m the proportion of the catch has been rather stable since 2000. At depths from 121 to 180 m, which includes the main spawning ground (Látragrunn), it the proportion of the catch increased in 2003-2008 but since then it has been decreasing (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Atlantic wolffish. Geographical distribution of the Icelandic fishery since 2008. Reported catch from logbooks.

Figure 2: Atlantic wolffish. Spatial distribution of the Icelandic fishery by fishing area since 2000 according to logbooks. All gears combined.

Figure 3: Atlantic wolffish. Depth distribution of demersal trawl, longline and demersal seine catches according to logbooks.

Landings trend

More than 97% of the Atlantic wolffish catch is taken by longliners (50-65%), demersal trawlers (20-30%) and demersal seiners (about 10%) (Figure 4). These proportions have been relatively stable through the years. However, in 2004-2008 longline and demersal trawl catches were similar (40-50%) and in the last three years catches by demersal seiners hasve been increasing and are now greater than in demersal trawlers (Figure 4). Since 2001, the number of longliners and trawlers reporting Atlantic wolffish catches of 10 tonnes/year or more has decreased. In the longline fleet, the number of vessels has dropped from 198 in 2001, down to 36 in 2023. The number of trawlers has also decreased significantly from 76 in 2000 to 49 in the last year (Table 1).

Figure 4: Atlantic wolffish. Total catch (landings) by fishing gear since 1994, according to statistics from the Directorate of Fisheries.

In 1994 and 1995, more than 500 vessels accounted for 95% of the annual catch of Atlantic wolffish in Icelandic waters, but this number had dropped to 200 vessels in 2008 despite higher catches. Since 2010 the number of vessels accounting for 95% of the annual catch has remained relatively constant (about 150-200 vessels), despite catch reductions (Figure 5).

Table 1: Atlantic wolffish. Number of Icelandic boats and catches by fleet segment participating in the Atlantic wolffish fishery from logbooks.
Year nr. longlines nr. bottom trawls nr. seiners nr. other gear Catch longlines Catch bottom trawls Catch seiners Catch other gear Total
2000 161 53 16 0 8687 3380 528 0 12595
2001 195 59 14 1 11267 3391 513 11 15182
2002 140 44 13 0 7773 3735 601 0 12110
2003 138 45 19 0 7785 5463 1066 0 14313
2004 103 34 29 0 4670 4773 1609 0 11052
2005 91 47 24 1 5445 6893 1140 30 13508
2006 120 48 25 0 6626 6286 1149 0 14061
2007 105 60 24 0 5259 7566 1338 0 14163
2008 87 60 22 3 4663 6960 1427 44 13093
2009 114 55 28 1 6708 5468 1205 10 13391
2010 74 46 20 3 5916 4436 842 92 11286
2011 64 37 18 0 5344 3565 1010 0 9918
2012 66 24 22 1 5328 2827 895 41 9091
2013 73 30 18 2 4652 2341 647 22 7662
2014 70 23 13 1 3681 1637 891 11 6220
2015 56 34 17 2 3989 1905 926 28 6848
2016 61 37 18 2 4848 1662 1127 25 7661
2017 59 28 18 2 3829 1102 1095 23 6049
2018 60 37 27 6 4923 1587 2186 74 8770
2019 64 34 21 1 4595 1630 2168 11 8404
2020 46 38 24 1 2491 2046 2040 11 6588
2021 45 48 22 0 3343 3021 2086 0 8451
2022 40 48 23 0 2706 2986 2275 0 7967
2023 36 49 20 0 3154 2756 2388 0 8298

Figure 5: Atlantic wolffish. Number of vessels (all gear types) accounting for 95% of the total catch annually since 1994. Left: Plotted against year. Right: Plotted against total catch. Data from the Directorate of Fisheries.

Data available

The commercial catch samples taken are normally representative of the landings with most number of samples taken in areas of high catch intensity (Figure 7).

Figure 6: Atlantic wolffish. Spatial distribution of length samples (black dots) from commercial catches in Icelandic waters (upper) and numbers of samples taken per month by project (bars) and proportion of landings per month (black line) (lower).

Landings and discards

Landings by Icelandic vessels are given by the Icelandic Directorate of Fisheries. Landings of Norwegian and Faroese vessels are given by the Icelandic Coast Guard. Discarding is banned by law in the Icelandic demersal fishery, as well as in Norway. Measures in the Icelandic management system such as converting quota share from one species to another are used by the Icelandic fleet to a large extent, and this is thought to discourage discards in mixed fisheries.

Sampling from commercial catches

In 1969-1997, on average 500 otoliths were sampled annually, except in 1970, 1973, and 1974 when no otoliths were sampled. In 1999, the effort of sampling Atlantic wolffish from commercial catch was increased. In the years 1999-2014 annual sampling of aged fish was 1600-3000 or on average 2200, but since 2015 this average has been around 1200 fish. In 2023, a total of 12, 21 and 25 samples were collected from longline, demersal trawl and demersal seine catches, respectively (Table 2, Figure 6).

Table 2: . Atlantic wolffish. Number of samples and aged fish from landed catch of Atlantic wolffish.
Year Longline (nr. of samples) Longline (nr. fish) Bottom trawl (nr. of samples) Bottom trawl (nr. fish) Demersal seine (nr. of samples) Demersal seine (nr. fish)
2000 29 1395 18 752 4 200
2001 27 1343 11 509 3 150
2002 25 1240 16 645 2 100
2003 31 1525 20 899 6 300
2004 19 950 23 1060 8 400
2005 15 746 25 1202 6 292
2006 23 1110 21 1029 5 250
2007 18 900 25 1250 10 451
2008 19 950 25 1248 4 200
2009 16 800 20 999 4 200
2010 29 1669 19 1090 5 285
2011 14 750 15 778 9 550
2012 26 1300 14 700 7 350
2013 25 1249 14 691 4 200
2014 30 800 26 675 28 700
2015 25 625 19 479 19 474
2016 25 625 13 325 9 225
2017 23 575 9 220 6 150
2018 22 550 9 225 17 425
2019 22 550 11 276 20 500
2020 9 225 14 350 16 400
2021 14 350 25 625 15 375
2022 3 60 23 465 17 338
2023 12 240 21 420 25 499

Length composition

The length distribution of landed Atlantic wolffish has been relatively stable since 2005 (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Atlantic wolffish. Length distribution from the Icelandic fleet from 2005-2023.

Age composition

Age composition data are available from surveys and from commercial catch. Commercial age data are available from earlier periods (1978). In samples from commercial landings, the mean age of Atlantic wolffish was around 10.7 years in 1999. Since then, mean age in samples from commercial catches has generally been increasing to around 12 years in recent years. In 2023, 8-16 year old fish are most common in catch (Figure 8 and Figure 9)

Figure 8: Atlantic wolffish. Catch at age from the commercial fishery in Iceland waters. Bar size is indicative of the catch in numbers and bars are coloured by cohort.

Figure 9: Atlantic wolffish. Catch at age from the commercial fishery in Iceland waters. Biomass caught by year and age; bars are coloured by cohort.

Weight-at-age

Weight-at-age data in Icelandic waters are available from 1996. Weight of the oldest year classes has been above average for the past years (Figure 10). Catch weight are shown in Figure 11.

Figure 10: Atlantic wolffish. Mean weight at age in the catch from the commercial fishery in Icelandic waters. Bars are coloured by cohort.

Figure 11: Atlantic wolffish. Catch weights by age from the commercial fishery in Icelandic waters.

Catch and effort

CPUE estimates of Atlantic wolffish in Icelandic waters are not considered representative of stock abundance, as changes in fleet composition, technical improvements and differences in gear setup among other things have not been accounted for when estimating CPUE. Non-standardized estimates of CPUE in longline (kg/1000 hooks), and demersal trawl (kg/hour), are calculated as the total weight in sets or tows in which Atlantic wolffish was more than 10% of the catch, according to logbooks. Effort of demersal trawl was defined as the number hours towed, and for longline number of hooks, in both cases where Atlantic wolffish was more than 10% of the catch. CPUE in longline vessels has been similar among years prior to 2018, around 100-150 kg/1000 hooks. CPUE of demersal trawl increased from about 230 to 400 kg/h in 2000-2005, but since 2006 it has fluctuated at around 250-300 kg/h (Figure 12). Both indices have shown a sharp decrease over the past three years. Fishing effort in longline increased from 66 million hooks in 2000 to 97 million hooks in 2001. Since then it has been generally decreasing and was around 22 million hooks in 2018. In demersal trawl, fishing effort increased from about 14 thousand tow-hours in 2004 to 23 thousand tow-hours in 2008, followed by a sharp decrease to 4.8 thousand tow-hours in 2014. Since then it has increased.

Figure 12: Atlantic wolffish. Non-standardized estimates of CPUE for demersal trawl (left, kg/h) and longline (right, kg/1000 hooks).

Survey data

The Icelandic spring groundfish survey (hereafter spring survey, IGFS), which has been conducted annually in March since 1985, covers the most important distribution area of Atlantic wolffish in Icelandic waters. In addition, the Icelandic autumn groundfish survey (hereafter autumn survey, IAGS) was started in 1996 and expanded in 2000. However, a full autumn survey was not conducted in 2011 due to a labour strike. Because the spring survey covers the main distribution area, it is considered adequate to measure changes in abundance/biomass of Atlantic wolffish better than the autumn survey. Total biomass and harvestable biomass indices decreased from 1985-1995. In 1996, the biomass index increased to 1998, then decreased to a historical low level in 2010-2012, but since then it has been increasing Figure 14). The harvestable biomass has generally been increasing from 1995 with considerable oscillators. The recruitment index was high in the years 1992-2003, since 1999 it has been decreasing, which coincides with increasing effort and catch of trawlers at the main spawning ground west of Iceland (Látragrunn) during the spawning and incubation time. The recruitment index reached a historical low level in 2011, but since then it has been rather stable or increased slightly. This coincides with that the closed spawning/incubation area on Látragrunn was enlarged from 500 km2 (from 2002) to 1000 km2 in October 2010.

When the spring survey is conducted, Atlantic wolffish are on their feeding grounds which are commonly in relatively shallow waters. In the spring survey, the highest abundance has always been measured in the NW area (Figure 15).

Figure 13: Atlantic wolffish. Location and abundance of ling in the spring survey (SMB) in 2024 and the autumn survey (SMH) in 2023.

Figure 14: Atlantic wolffish. Total biomass indices (upper left) and harvestable biomass indices (≥60 cm, upper right), large fish biomass indices (≥80 cm, lower left) and juvenile abundance indices (≤40 cm, lower right), from the spring survey (blue) and the autumn survey (red), along with the standard deviation.

Figure 15: Atlantic wolffish. Spatial distribution of biomass index from the spring and autumn survey.

Figure 16: Atlantic wolffish. Length distribution from the spring and autumn survey.

Figure 17: Atlantic wolffish. Age disaggregated indices in the autumn survey (left), gillnet survey (middle) and the spring survey (right). Fill colours indicate cohorts. Note different scales on y-axes.

Stock weight at age

Mean weight at age in the survey is shown in Figure 16. Stock weights are obtained from the groundfish survey in March and are also used as mean weight at age in the spawning stock.

Figure 18: Atlantic wolffish. Stock weights from the spring survey in Icelandic waters. Bars are coloured by cohort.

Stock maturity and natural mortality

Females have the most reliable maturity designations; a maturation scale for males is unavailable. Therefore, maturity analysis is based on females caught during the autumn survey and in commercial catches from June – December. From these data, maturation occurs close to 60 cm and around age 10 but is highly variable and difficult to measure. Proportion mature at age has increased for the past 20 years for most age gorups (Figure 19 and Figure 20. No information is available on natural mortality. For assessment and advisory purposes, the natural mortality is set to 0.15 for all age groups.

Figure 19: Atlantic wolffish. Maturity at age in the survey. Bars are coloured by cohort. The values are used to calculate the spawning stock.

Figure 20: Atlantic wolffish. Proportion mature at age from the spring survey.

Data analysis

Assessment on Atlantic wolffish in Icelandic waters using SAM

Atlantic wolffish in 5a is new to ICES and an assessment method was established during benchmark in april 2022. Atlantic wolffish became part of the ICES assessment process after an MoU between Iceland and ICES was signed in December 1st 2019. During the benchmark in April 2022, a SAM model (State-space stock assessment model) was agreed upon for use in the assessment.

Data used by the assessment and model settings

The new assessment model is a statistical catch at age model based on:

  • commercial catch-at-age and landings data from 1979 onwards,

  • the Icelandic spring groundfish survey from 1985,

  • the autumn groundfish survey in Iceland from 2000.

The maximum age of the model is 16, which is considered a plus group. The assessment showed that SSB has been rather stable over the time period, while fishing mortality has gradually decreased, and recruitment has slightly decreased after 2001 but remained stable.

Natural mortality of 0.15 was chosen for all age groups. During the workshop, a wide range of estimates for natural mortality were tested and none showed a significant improvement in terms of model fit. It was therefore decided to use a M of 0.15.

Diagnostics

Figure 21 shows the overall fit to the survey indices described in the stock annex and catch. In general, the model appears to follow the stock trends historically. Furthermore, the terminal estimate is not seen to deviate substantially from the observed value for most age groups. The overview of model parameter estimates are shown in Figure 27.

Figure 21: Atlantic wolffish. Model fit to indices from the spring survey, autumn survey and catch. Black dots are observed values and the black line is the model fit.

Figure 22: Atlantic wolffish. Model fit to landings Black dots are observed values and the black line is the model fit.

Model results

Model results show that Atlantic wolffish total biomass levels decreased from high levels in 2000 – 2012 but have increased since then and are now at its highest level. Recruitment levels have also increased after being at the lowest level in 2011. Spawning stock biomass has also shown a steady increase since 1992 (Figure 23).

Figure 23: Atlantic wolffish. Model results of population dynamics overview: estimated catch, average fishing mortality over ages 10-15 (Fbar), recruitment (age 4), and spawning stock biomass (SSB). Catch and fbar values in 2024 are projections.

Retrospective analysis

The results of an analytical retrospective analysis are presented in Figure 24. The analysis indicates relatively stable estimation, except in the earliest peel. Mohn’s rho was estimated to be -0.0428503 for SSB, 0.0534171 for F, and -0.0694343 for recruitment.

Figure 24: Atlantic wolffish. Retrospective plots illustrating stability in model estimates over a 5-year “peel” in data. Results of spawning stock biomass, fishing mortality F, and recruitment (age 4) are shown.

Neither observation nor process residuals show obvious trends (Figure 25 and Figure 26).

Figure 25: Atlantic wolffish. Observation error residuals of the SAM model.

Figure 26: Atlantic wolffish. Process error residuals of the SAM model.

Figure 27: Atlantic wolffish. Illustration of estimated model parameters.

Reference points

As part of the WKICEMP 2022 HCR evaluations (ICES 2022c), the following reference points were defined.

Table 3: Atlantic wolffish. Reference points adopted from ICES WKICEMP 2022
Framework Reference_point Value Technical_basis
MSY Approach MSY Btrigger 21000 Bpa
FMSY 0.2 F that produces MSY in the long term
Precautionary Approach Blim 18500 Bloss (SSB in 2002)
Bpa 21000 Blim x e1.645 * σB
Flim 0.33 Fishing mortality that in stochastic equilibrium will result in median SSB at Blim.
Fpa 0.2 Maximum F at which the probability of SSB falling below Blim is <5%
Management plan MGT Btrigger 21000 According to the harvest control rule
FMGT 0.2 According to the harvest control rule

Current Advisory Framework

Reference points were calculated for the stock. This resulted in B\(_{pa}\) of 21 000 t, based on the lowest estimate of SSB observed after the 2001 shift in recruitment had been observed (2002), and B\(_{lim}\) = B\(_{pa} e^{-1.645\sigma_B}\) of 18 500 t, with \(\sigma_B\) being set to the ICES default of 0.2. The fishing pressure estimates, defined in terms of fishing mortality applied to ages from 10 to 15, were estimated in accordance to the ICES guidelines. This resulted in an estimate of F\(_{lim}\) of 0.33, F\(_{p05}\) of 0.20 and F\(_{msy}\) of 0.20. The MSY B\(_{trigger}\) was set as B\(_{pa}\).

A Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) was conducted for Atlantic wolffish in 5a. The operating model, which generates the “true” future populations in the simulations, was based on equilibrium simulations (eqsim). Selection, maturity and stock weights were based on the resampling of estimates by age from previous 10 years. Recruitment was projected using a log-normal distribution based on the distribution of CVs and autocorrelations estimated by the assessment model with MCMC resampling with a break point in B\(_{lim}\). Advice error in the simulations was implemented as auto-correlated log-normal variations in F, with a CV of 0.212 and \(\rho\) of 0.423.

The proposed HCR for the Icelandic Atlantic wolffish fishery, which sets a TAC for the fishing year y/y+1 (September 1 of year y to August 31 of year y+1) based on a fishing mortality \(F_{mgt}\) of 0.20 applied to ages 10 to 15 modified by the ratio SSB\(_{y}\)/MGT B\(_{trigger}\) when SSB\(_y\) < MGT B\(_{trigger}\), maintains a high yield while being precautionary as it results in lower than 5% probability of SSB < B\(_{lim}\) in the medium and long term.

Management

The Ministry of Industries and Innovation is responsible for management of the Icelandic fisheries and implementation of legislation. Atlantic wolffish was included in the ITQ system in the 1996/1997 quota year and as such subjected to TAC limitations. From that time to the fishing year 2004/2005, the catch was on average 5% more than recommended by the MRI, although in some years it was lower than advised TAC. In the fishing years 2005/2006 to 2011/2012, the catch was on average around 34% above the advised TAC. The main reasons were that national TAC was set higher than the advised TAC, and quota of other species were being transferred to Atlantic wolffish quota (Table 4, Figure 28). Net transfer of Atlantic wolffish quota for each fishing year is usually less than 10%.

Table 4: Atlantic wolffish. Recommended TAC, national TAC, and catches (tonnes).
Fishing year Recommended catch National TAC Catches Iceland Catch other nations Total catch
1998/1999 13000 13000 13138 105 13139
1999/2000 13000 13000 14913 23 14913
2000/2001 13000 13000 18083 147 18083
2001/2002 13000 16100 13681 86 13681
2002/2003 15000 15000 16942 95 16943
2003/2004 15000 15000 13255 86 13255
2004/2005 13000 16000 14201 84 14201
2005/2006 13000 13000 16461 66 16461
2006/2007 12000 13000 15817 88 15817
2007/2008 11000 12500 15098 65 15098
2008/2009 12000 13000 15429 73 15429
2009/2010 10000 12000 13091 27 13091
2010/2011 8500 12000 11669 17 12078
2011/2012 7500 10500 10582 24 10582
2012/2013 7500 8500 8940 16 8940
2013/2014 7500 7500 7500 6 7530
2014/2015 7500 7500 7829 33 7862
2015/2016 8200 8200 8910 72 8982
2016/2017 8811 8811 7510 32 7542
2017/2018 8540 8540 9515 38 9553
2018/2019 9020 9020 9330 25 9355
2019/2020 8344 8344 7149 17 7166
2020/2021 8761 8761 8953 21 8974
2021/2022 8933 8933 8550 12 8562
2022/2023 8107 8107 8691 42 8733
2023/2024 8344 8344


2024/2025 9378



Figure 28: Atlantic wolffish. Net transfer of quota to and from ling in the Icelandic ITQ system by fishing year. Between species (upper): Positive values indicate a transfer of other species to ling, but negative values indicate a transfer of ling quota to other species. Between years (lower): Transfer of quota from given quota year to the next quota year.

Management considerations

A reduction in fishing mortality has led to harvestable biomass and SSB that seem to be stable. Atlantic wolffish is a slow-growing late-maturing species, therefore closures of known spawning areas should be maintained and expanded if needed. Similarly, closed areas fishing where there is high juvenile abundance should also be maintained and expanded if needed.

Ecosystem considerations

Most fishing for Atlantic wolffish occurs in the northwest and west of Iceland, where the fastest growing Atlantic wolffish are found. A likely cause for differences in growth is environmental differences between the relatively warm southwestern waters versus colder northeaster waters. However, Atlantic wolffish are also highly sedentary, especially while guarding nests during spawning and rearing season, and therefore additional metapopulation structure cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is possible that local depletion may occur in more heavily fished areas despite a stable overall biomass level.

Summary of the assessment

::: {#tbl-table5 .cell tbl-cap=’ Atlantic wolffish. Assessment summary by calendar year. Catches are ICES estimates.’} ::: {.cell-output-display}

Year Recruitment (age 4) 2.5% lower CI 97.5% upper CI 2.5% lower CI SSB 97.5% upper CI 2.5% lower CI F ages 10-15 97.5% upper CI Catch (tonnes)
1979 19159 15975 22978 13388 15377 17662 0.27 0.36 0.48 10775
1980 18158 15476 21305 13768 16059 18732 0.20 0.27 0.36 8857
1981 19048 16424 22092 15294 17869 20876 0.21 0.27 0.34 8621
1982 18926 16424 21810 16799 19574 22807 0.18 0.22 0.27 8435
1983 18405 16045 21112 19058 22037 25480 0.22 0.27 0.33 12214
1984 17204 15102 19597 20295 23206 26534 0.20 0.24 0.29 10249
1985 17367 15331 19674 21402 24274 27531 0.15 0.18 0.22 9708
1986 16931 14982 19133 23797 26852 30298 0.19 0.23 0.27 12147
1987 17651 15650 19907 25029 28104 31557 0.21 0.24 0.29 12605
1988 16941 15032 19092 25035 28037 31399 0.26 0.31 0.37 14611
1989 17416 15473 19604 23858 26488 29407 0.23 0.28 0.33 14128
1990 18888 16796 21239 24624 27115 29857 0.26 0.31 0.36 14534
1991 21063 18766 23642 24138 26581 29272 0.32 0.38 0.45 18015
1992 22515 20069 25260 20632 22849 25305 0.34 0.40 0.46 16079
1993 24200 21448 27304 17074 18979 21097 0.30 0.35 0.41 11112
1994 24832 21822 28257 15015 16630 18419 0.28 0.33 0.38 11344
1995 19108 17047 21417 15317 16830 18494 0.27 0.32 0.37 11393
1996 20278 18186 22611 16603 18054 19631 0.32 0.37 0.44 14781
1997 21395 19154 23897 17927 19262 20696 0.24 0.28 0.33 11737
1998 20610 18506 22954 18866 20143 21507 0.22 0.25 0.29 11995
1999 17322 15589 19249 19607 20958 22401 0.23 0.26 0.30 13961
2000 15993 14388 17777 19044 20391 21834 0.21 0.25 0.28 15101
2001 18466 16640 20494 18842 20229 21719 0.24 0.27 0.31 18169
2002 16637 14914 18558 18585 19956 21428 0.18 0.21 0.24 14385
2003 15942 14232 17857 21099 22718 24461 0.21 0.24 0.28 16536
2004 15749 14151 17528 22328 24089 25988 0.18 0.20 0.23 13260
2005 12692 11257 14310 21884 23609 25470 0.18 0.21 0.24 15294
2006 11786 10631 13067 21885 23622 25496 0.22 0.25 0.28 16488
2007 9691 8696 10800 22644 24399 26291 0.23 0.27 0.31 16204
2008 10239 9203 11390 23070 24881 26834 0.21 0.24 0.28 14694
2009 10725 9577 12012 22654 24455 26399 0.24 0.27 0.31 15280
2010 11349 10197 12632 20489 22174 23998 0.23 0.26 0.30 12634
2011 10229 9166 11415 19378 21074 22919 0.21 0.24 0.28 11372
2012 9229 8260 10313 18736 20393 22197 0.21 0.24 0.28 10217
2013 10099 9020 11306 18458 20135 21963 0.18 0.21 0.24 8798
2014 10389 9260 11656 18605 20291 22129 0.16 0.19 0.22 7328
2015 11249 9982 12676 21277 23183 25260 0.15 0.18 0.21 8041
2016 12307 10873 13931 23826 25954 28273 0.17 0.20 0.23 8699
2017 12982 11402 14780 25449 27767 30296 0.17 0.20 0.23 7275
2018 13728 11982 15728 24867 27179 29707 0.21 0.24 0.28 9694
2019 13986 12130 16126 24641 27086 29773 0.19 0.22 0.26 9215
2020 14242 12240 16573 24885 27500 30390 0.15 0.18 0.21 7340
2021 13946 11830 16441 27153 30180 33545 0.17 0.21 0.25 9063
2022 14992 12499 17981 28094 31447 35200 0.15 0.19 0.23 8739
2023 18790 15138 23322 29420 33215 37500 0.15 0.19 0.24 8774
2024 20256 15414 26621 30306 34565 39421 - - - -

::: :::

References

Gunnarsson, Á., Hjörleifsson, E., Thórarinsson, K., Marteinsdóttir, G., 2006. Growth, maturity and fecundity of wolffish Anarhichas lupus L. in Icelandic waters. Journal of Fish Biology, 68, 1158-1176. doi: 10.1111/j.1095- 8649.2006.00990.

Gunnarsson, Á., Sólmundsson, J., Björnsson, H., Sigurðsson, G., Pampoulie, C., 2019. Migration pattern and evidence of homing in Atlantic wolffish (Anarhichas lupus). Fisheries Research, 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.03.001

ICES. 2022. Workshop on the evaluation of assessments and management plans for ling, tusk, plaice and Atlantic wolffish in Icelandic waters (WKICEMP). ICES Scientific Reports. 4:37. 271 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.19663971